tpan.com Quick Links

2004 HIV Drug Guide

2004 HIV Services Directory

Positively Aware

Positively Aware en Español

News Briefs

New Ziagen warning

How a cough can kill you: when it’s part of an allergic reaction to the HIV med Ziagen (abacavir). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently added respiratory problems such as cough, sore throat and difficulty breathing to the warning on Ziagen’s label (see the package insert—that folded up paper with the small type). These symptoms are now recognized as signs that a person may be having a hypersensitivity (allergic) reaction to the drug. According to the FDA, “Deaths have been reported in patients receiving Ziagen who were initially diagnosed with an acute respiratory disease (pneumonia, bronchitis, or flu-like illness) and who were later recognized to have had a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir that included respiratory symptoms.” Ziagen manufacturer Glaxo Wellcome reported that 11 deaths have occurred out of 1,000 people who experienced hypersensitivity. More than 60,000 people have taken the drug, the company reported.

The respiratory symptoms occurred in one out of five people experiencing hypersensitivity (about 6% of all people on the drug). If hypersensitivity occurs, Ziagen must be stopped permanently. Attempts to go back on the drug (called “rechallenging”) lead to severe illness and could cause death. Symptoms return within hours and are more severe. Looking at 112 people who were re-challenged, dangerously low blood pressure occurred in 24% and abnormally fast heartbeat (tachycardia) occurred in 11%.

The most common signs of Ziagen hypersensitivity are fever, malaise (discomfort, as with the flu), rash, fatigue, and gastrointestinal problems such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or stomach pain. As seen from the FDA statement, misdiagnosis may occur. According to Dr. Seth Hetherington, head of clinical research for Ziagen, “The golden rule is: if you can’t tell the difference between an acute illness and a hypersensitivity reaction, you have to stop abacavir.” (See “Ziagen hypersensitivity” below.)

Ziagen hypersensitivity

A review of hypersensitivity (allergic reaction) to Ziagen (abacavir) by the drug’s manufacturer noted that there were 1,015 cases among the 26,769 people taking it during studies or expanded access (before it became available in pharmacies). More than 98% of people had at least fever and/or rash, but 30% did not have rash at all. Symptoms became more severe over several days. Early symptoms tend to include fever, gastrointestinal problems (such as stomach pain or diarrhea ?), or malaise (overall feeling of discomfort, as with the flu). Rash was more common later on. (See "New Ziagen warning"elsewhere in News Briefs.) To report hypersensitivity cases, call the manufacturer at (800) 270—0425 or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) at Medwatch, (800) 532–4440.

7th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections

This major HIV/AIDS conference took place in San Francisco January 29-February 2. Some highlights follow. Visit www.retrovirus.com for complete information. Also see www.medscape.com, www.thebody.com and www.HIVandHepatitis.com for summaries (in addition to other HIV magazines and newsletters).

Oral sex

New information on oral sex drove people wild at the Retrovirus Conference. Basically, researchers noted a higher than expected risk of HIV from unprotected oral sex on a man–7.8%. However, critics noted that people tend to lie about their risk factors. Then again, the researchers said they eliminated lying and other problems as much as possible. Moreover, they believe that because people think oral sex has little or no risk of HIV, they engage in it more often, thereby increasing their risk through sheer number of contacts. Bottom line: unprotected oral sex has always been a risk, but always much lower than unprotected anal or vaginal sex.

CMV pills

French researchers urged the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) to change its guidelines on opportunistic infections—those diseases that attack when the immune system is weakened. The guidelines say that prevention drugs for cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be stopped for people whose T-cells go back above 200 for at least six months—if they never had CMV. But for people who have had an episode of CMV, it wasn’t sure whether or not they could stop taking drugs used to prevent a second episode. Therefore, now French doctors say that a review of an adequately large number of people from European HIV studies show that yes, these people too can stop taking prophylaxis for CMV. CMV is a serious complication of AIDS often leading to loss of vision, blindness or death. It occurs more commonly at T-cell counts under 50.

Fewer deaths

Once again, fewer deaths were found among people with HIV taking HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy). But French researchers noted that mortality was still 8.7 times higher than in the general population. Among people with HIV, women had a higher mortality rate. There were also deaths from causes other than complications of AIDS. Moreover, there were deaths in people who had undetectable viral load (the level of HIV in their blood).

Superinfection

It’s finally been documented: two people with HIV can pass on a new HIV strain to each other. So-called "superinfection" (from "super" meaning one on top of the other, as in "superimpose") was shown in this case because both men attended the same medical clinic in Ottawa, Canada, so that blood samples could be compared.

Camps for kids

The Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area (LSS) seeks donations for a camp for children with HIV who live in the D.C. area. The camp will be run by Project Safe Haven, a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the social well-being of children and youth living with the virus, or affected by it. Donations can be sent to Office of Stewardship, Lutheran Social Services, 4406 Georgia Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20011. For more information, call Danielle Walter at LSS, (202) 723—3000 ext. 291. Camp Safe Haven operates a one-week camp in Martha’s Vineyard every April, as well as other camps, mostly throughout the East Coast. Call (508) 693-1767, write P.O. Box 24, Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 or visit www.charityweb.net/safehaven.

Treatment interruptions

What used to be "stop-and-go" therapy is now called "strategic treatment interruption," or STI, to emphasize the need to be careful. The strategy arose primarily from information about the Berlin patient. This man started therapy early in infection, then had to stop for several weeks. He went back on treatment, but again had to stop after a few weeks. Afterwards, he never again had detectable viral load (HIV in the blood), despite never again taking antiviral drugs. Can HIV drugs be used off-and-on as a sort of vaccine against the virus? More studies are needed—don't try this at home! Reseachers emphasize the need to use STI under controlled, closely monitored studies only.

St. John's wort decreases blood levels of HIV drugs

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February issued a warning that St. John’s wort has been found to lower blood levels of Crixivan (indinavir) HIV protease inhibitor, and probably, therefore, other protease inhibitors (Agenerase, saquinavir, Norvir, and Viracept) as well as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Rescriptor, Sustiva, and Viramune). The herb is used to relieve depression. It should not be used by people taking any of these HIV medications because it may cause the drugs to be ineffective.

Effect of drugs on infants

One study found that uninfected children of HIV-positive moms still suffered some damage to their immune systems. However, this may be because they were effectively able to fight off HIV, which hurt their immune cells in the process. The findings came from 19 infants who had all been exposed to AZT to prevent infection and 42 older children who had not been exposed to AZT (their average age was around seven).

Anti-HIV drugs = more risky business

A study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the University of California-San Francisco found that people who believe HIV drugs can control the virus are more likely to take greater risks of infection. Comparing different risk groups, researchers found that 40% of injection drug users were less concerned about becoming infected, compared to 30% of heterosexuals who had attended a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (a higher risk group than those not in need of STD services) and 25% of MSM (men who have sex with men—thus called to include men who do not identify as gay). For those same groups, the percentage of people who reported being "less careful" were 25%, 15% and 13%, respectively. The report also noted that, "Of the 71% of MSM who had recent non-primary partners, more of those who reported being less concerned [about infection] had engaged in unprotected receptive anal intercourse (65% vs. 41%), as had those who reported being less careful (71% vs. 29%)." The researchers concluded that "prevention programs should consider balancing risk reduction and treatment information with improved knowledge of the uncertainties of the long-term success of HAART [highly active antiretroviral therapy]." Added the CDC in a press release, "Many may not realize the complexity and toxicity of these regimens." The results came from more than 600 people in each of the three groups. Overall—combining the three risk groups—31% were less concerned about infection and 17% (almost one in five people) were less careful about sex or drug use.


San Francisco PEP

That’s post-exposure prophylaxis, also known as “the morning after pill” for HIV. (In reality, it’s usually many pills for many weeks). The still often controversial program saw 401 people in its first 16 months. One concern before the program started was that the “worried well” would clog it up. These are people who seek attention (sometimes obsessively) even though they’re at low risk. Instead, PEP users tended to have high risk. For example, 57% of gay men who entered the program had had unprotected receptive anal sex. There was an average of 33 hours between exposure and starting PEP—animal studies suggest that PEP should begin within 36 hours. Most people (88%) were given Combivir for 28 days. Combivir is a combination of Retrovir (AZT) and Epivir (3TC), taken as one tablet twice a day. The simplified regimen was completed by 78% of participants.

There were no seroconversions to HIV, but researchers stressed that the program cannot be expected to reduce the rate of transmission in San Francisco, estimated at 500 new infections a year. The program’s main benefit, they say, is lowering future risk for participants, thanks to appropriate counseling. A total of 12% of participants came back for a second PEP within six months. The vast majority of participants were unlikely to have multiple sex partners and did not use the program as a way to have unsafe sex.

 

| Positively Aware | 2004 HIV Drug Guide | Positively Aware en español |

|Chicago Area HIV Services Directory | Publications Home |

| Publications | Client Services | MOCHA | Events | Helping TPAN |

| Contacts and Staff | About TPAN | Ask TPAN | Links | TPAN Home |